While it is understandable that some may seek an explicit marriage record as definitive proof, it is crucial to recognize the historical context in which Rebecca Poythress and Richard Pace lived. Records from the late 17th and early 18th centuries are often incomplete, lost, or never created, especially in frontier and rural regions.
In lieu of a direct marriage license or church record, this study relies on a thorough analysis of original deeds, property transfers, family relationships, and documented interactions spanning several decades. These multiple, independent lines of evidence collectively build a compelling case for the marriage.
The consistent presence of Rebecca Poythress’ closest relatives within Rebecca Pace’s family circle, the pattern of land ownership and inheritance, and the absence of any viable alternative husband candidate, all point strongly to the same conclusion. Furthermore, the use of maiden names in legal documents during this period does not contradict the existence of a marriage; it was a common legal practice rather than evidence of single status.
Rejecting the conclusion that Rebecca Poythress married Richard Pace demands an alternative explanation that is equally comprehensive and consistent with the full range of known facts—such an explanation has not been presented despite extensive research.
Therefore, until compelling contrary evidence emerges, it is both reasonable and academically responsible to accept the well-supported conclusion that Rebecca Poythress and Richard Pace, Jr. were indeed married.
%20(2)a.jpg)